<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>WIPO SCP discussions with open standards</title>
		<link>http://www.digistan.org/forum/t-136934/wipo-scp-discussions-with-open-standards</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;WIPO SCP discussions with open standards&quot; - Knowledge Econology contributes a proposal for a link between standard setting organisations and patent disclosure.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.digistan.org/forum/t-136934#post-408869</guid>
				<title>WIPO SCP discussions with open standards</title>
				<link>http://www.digistan.org/forum/t-136934/wipo-scp-discussions-with-open-standards#post-408869</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>arebenti</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>36024</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Knowledge Ecology International adds a proposal concerning open standards to <a href="http://www.wipo.int/scp/en/meetings/session_13/pdf/kei.pdfits">submission for the WIPO Standing Committee on Patents 13th session</a>. Their proposal could provide a solution for standards organisations such as ISO.</p> <blockquote> <p>Attachment – Part 6.1 and 6.2 of May 10, 2005 Draft proposal for a Treaty on Access to Knowledge<br /> Part 6 - <strong>Promotion of Open Standards</strong><br /> Article 6-1 - Committee on Open Standards<br /> A committee on open standards (COS) shall be established.<br /> Article 6-2 - Disclosure obligations for patents relating to standards development organizations.<br /> (a) The COS shall establish a process and criteria for a Standards Development Organization<br /> (SDO) to request a managed disclosure of relevant patent claims for standards relevant to a<br /> knowledge good or service. To make such a request, the SDO must be global, with a<br /> membership that is open to any party, and the qualifying open standard must:<br /> <strong>VERSION 1</strong><br /> i. be adopted and maintained by a not-for-profit organization, and with ongoing<br /> development based upon an open decision-making procedure available to all interested<br /> parties (consensus or majority decision);<br /> ii. be published, with the specification of the standard available either freely or at a nominal<br /> charge, with permissible to all to copy, distribute and use it for no fee or at a nominal fee;<br /> and<br /> iii. the intellectual property aspects of the standard, including the relevant patents or data,<br /> shall be made irrevocably available on a royalty-free basis; and<br /> iv. there are no constraints on the re-use of the standard.<br /> <strong>VERSION 2</strong><br /> i. be published without restriction (e.g., potential implementers are not restricted from<br /> accessing the standard) in electronic or tangible form, and in sufficient detail to enable a<br /> complete understanding of the standard’s scope and purpose;<br /> ii. be publicly available without cost or for a reasonable non-discriminatory fee for adoption<br /> and implementation by any interested party;<br /> iii. Any patent or data rights necessary to implement the standards are made available by<br /> those developing the specification to all implementers on reasonable and nondiscriminatory<br /> (RAND) terms (either with or without payment of a reasonable royalty or<br /> fee); and<br /> iv. The process to develop, maintain, approve, or ratify the standard is by consensus, in a<br /> market-driven standards-setting organization that is open to all interested and qualified<br /> participants.<br /> (b) The request for a managed disclosure process shall include the following:<br /> i. A description of the SDO<br /> ii. An initial specification of the standard, including the expected applications for the<br /> standard,<br /> iii. The benefits to the public of the development of the standard,<br /> iv. Disclosures of patents relevant to the proposed standard that are not responsive to the<br /> requirements to be specific with regard to the relevance of the patent to the proposed<br /> standard shall be rejected.<br /> (c) Members agree that a patent holder that fails to make constructive disclosures of relevant<br /> patent claims will be prevented from enforcing the patent against the implementation of the<br /> open standard.</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
